Automated System Monitoring and Resolution
Most monitoring tells you something broke. That is useful at 9am and close to useless at 2am, because knowing about a problem is not the same as it being handled. The more valuable version diagnoses the failure and tries the fix first.
Time saved: about 2 hours a week
Estimated value: $2,600 a year
What it costs you today
- Alerts arrive at all hours, and most of them describe problems with a known, repetitive fix.
- Someone still has to read the alert, work out the severity, and apply that fix by hand.
- Quiet failures are worse than loud ones: a system that stops reporting looks identical to a system with nothing to report.
What the agent does
- The agent watches your systems continuously rather than on a polling schedule you maintain.
- When something breaks it diagnoses the issue, classifies it by severity, and attempts a resolution.
- It contacts you only when it genuinely cannot resolve something, so an alert reaching you means it needs you.
This one is already running
Built for a business running multiple automated workflows. It monitors logs across hosted CI and self-managed servers, classifies failures by severity, and resolves the common ones without anyone being woken up.
Common questions
What stops it making a bad situation worse?
Scope. It attempts only the specific resolutions it has been given, and escalates anything outside them. An agent permitted to try anything is not an asset, it is a risk.
How do I know it is still working?
Because silence is designed to be suspicious rather than reassuring. A monitor that has stopped reporting should raise an alarm, not be mistaken for a quiet week.
Would this work for your business?
An Automation Audit maps your actual processes and tells you honestly which one to automate first. If the numbers do not stack up, we say so.